Hieronymus Bosch’s teeming, hallucinatory triptych on Eden, fleshly pleasures and damnation, The Garden of Earthly Delights (1503–04), inspired Martha Clarke’s dance-theater hit of 1984. And although its unitards, aerial stunts and liberal use of didgeridoo mark it as a piece of 1980s dance theater, perhaps Garden will, in turn, inspire young artists. Regardless, newbies and nostalgists can both welcome the return of Clarke’s stark, luscious phantasmagoria—equal parts erotic rapture, comic grotesque and kinetic terror.
The fact that this hour-long suite of theatricalized dances (accompanied by Richard Peaslee’s minimalist-folk music) features a troupe of attractive performers in semitransparent flesh-toned unitards doesn’t hurt, of course. Despite Garden’s implication that a life spent in pursuit of gratification will end in eternal, tormenting hellfire, it’s a solid date play: sensual, visually sumptuous and—take note, fellas—classy.
Given the abundance of nudes that appear frolicking (or being roasted alive) in the original canvas, Clarke bases much of her choreographic vocabulary on male-female duets, with one sex manipulating the other’s body—as when women stand on men’s bodies as if they were small barks, punting along with long, gnarled branches. The boundaries between human flesh and objects are often blurred: In one humorous bit, men hold rattle sticks at their crotches and shake them with priapic insistence. Like much in this remarkable assemblage, the gesture is sexy, silly, and a bit scary.
Really worth seeing, it is very inventive . It takes a few minutes to get involved, then it flies by. Polished , professional performance. Re review: The notion of and emphasis on the torments of hell as consequences of behavior when alive reflects the common belief at the time the painting was done and is an idea that still has its believers now
First of all Mr. Cote. Had you seen the version from 84? This new version is completely different and contemporary. Another question, did you actually stay for the duration of show? The didgeridoo is used only once. By stating there is liberal use of it, you completely render yourself incompetent as a journalist. It is a shame you didn't give this masterpiece it is due; and the review it deserved.