Photographs: Roxana Marroquin
The unseen forces that can hurt a career in the kitchen—personality clashes, poor timing, bad business deals—have bumped chef Rick Laakkonen nearly off the island (to its southern tip, to be exact). After a few questionable gigs (Buddha Bar, Tao), the toque once touted by critics as among the city’s most inventive has quietly settled into Delmonico’s. Taking into consideration the venue—a relic just below Wall Street—and the clumsy food, the position doesn’t seem to be about much more than a paycheck.
Delmonico’s, which opened on William Street in 1831, was the country’s first fine-dining establishment. Today, long past its heyday, it’s become little more than a tourist trap. Laakkonen’s arrival isn’t likely to restore any of its luster.
In fact, it seems pretty clear that Delmonico’s patrons neither know nor care who’s running the kitchen. If bankers still gather there for conspiratorial powwows, it’s surely only out of habit or convenience. The dining room was half empty on recent visits, and the blasé waiters—in burgundy vests that match the wall-to-wall carpeting—seem accustomed to doing little.
Instead of making a connection with the setting and the food—offering modern riffs on old-fashioned fare—Laakkonen delivers contemporary compositions that are utterly out of place. One starter—a classic combination of goat cheese, toasted hazelnuts and beets—made a visual splash with beets shaved into ribbons and chopped into a sort of tartare, yet it tasted like nothing more than a standard-issue bistro salad. A more intriguing scallop starter, too, turned out to be a clunker. The seafood was nicely caramelized, but the supporting players—mealy artichoke heart, portobellos, gluey spinach pappardelle—had clearly been miscast. And though the lobster bisque—floating American caviar and lobster hunks—was as creamy as you’d expect, it bore so little of the chef’s personality that it might have been on the menu for the last 100 years.
Entrées also hobbled along. A “Cioppino style” seafood stew—an obscenely generous heap of mussels, clams, shrimp and lobster tossed with thick tomato sauce and fregola—tasted like jarred sauce and not much else. Grilled branzino with starchy buckwheat pasta had the acrid flavor of fish that had been idling over an open flame. Even a simple veal chop disappointed, the bland meat accompanied by a tepid cauliflower puree. Only the signature Delmonico steak—a rich, juicy boneless ribeye served with a tangle of fried onions—was worthy of its reputation.
Desserts, unfortunately, delivered little validation. A mango and key-lime bar was sickly sweet. While the baked Alaska—filled with apricot jam and banana ice cream—was also cloying, it at least had nostalgia and caramelized meringue peaks in its favor.
Unlike some landmark restaurants—21 Club and La Grenouille—Delmonico’s ceased to be relevant long ago. Without the institutional memory of loyal staff and devoted patrons, the place might as well be a museum. Even with a modern chef, history is all that it’s peddling.
Cheat sheet
Drink this: Though requests for guidance through the pricey wine list produced only shrugs from the waiter, the one wine he pushed—a velvety Wyatt pinot noir from Sonoma ($56)—turned out to be a reasonably priced hit (for this list).
Eat this: Lobster bisque, Delmonico steak, baked Alaska
Sit here: The tables in back offer the most privacy for the sort of business whispering this restaurant still draws. The casual Delmonico’s Grill next door, featuring a pub-grub version of the restaurant’s menu, is a more inviting spot for a bite.
Conversation piece: In the 178 years since Delmonico’s opened, it has been credited as the birthplace of lobster Newburg, eggs Benedict and baked Alaska.
Tourist trap?? working for timeout ny you have the nerve to call something a tourist trap?? I mean if you were a writer for the ny times, id take this review seriously...I usually see post college kids living in murray hill checking time out ny for the hot spots...Ive been in delmonicos several times and have had nothing but an amazing time...Its not a place trying to compete with BLT..It is what it is...Next thing you know, Jays going to tell you highlights magazine needs to revamp its magazine
Sneakereater, you cite 21 as an example of authenticity, but it has changed hands and locations, too...several times. It''s owned by Orient-Express Hotels....a big conglomerate so how is that more authentic than single family ownership.
Tucci bought it soon after it closed in 1926...that's a far cry from the 1950s... and the decor was much the same as it was under the original owners....lots of restaurants change owners — they even die sometimes — but if the ambiance remains the same and the menu is in the same spirit. for me, it's essentially the same restaurant. I understand that Tucci made a conscious effort to maintain the original spirit of the place. The new place is totally different.
Make that 1923 for the original close. The point still stands.
As other commentators have noted, that incarnation opened in 1998. The original in that location closed in 1926. Do a little research next time--even Wikipedia has it right. I'm honestly surprised a major magazine would allow this in print.
I don't want to argue with you, but how is "Oscar Tucci owned the restaurant at its present location for much of the mid-century" different from "[t]hen, in the fifties, someone opened a new Delmonico's downtown"? (If it was in the forties rather than the fitties, I apologize.) The fact remains: the current Delmonico's has no continuity with the legendary New York eatery where Lobster Newberg was invented in the mid-late 19th Century.
Sneakereater has the facts wrong. Oscar Tucci owned the restaurant at its present location for much of the mid-twentieth century. During that period, it created its own, but equally important history. The present incarnation looks nothing like it did under his ownership. It had large red leather banquettes...Belle Epoque.
Perhaps the reason Delmonico's seems less relevant than old school classics like the 21 Club and Le Grenouille is that, unlike them, the current iteration of Delmonicos has no relationship to the historic original. The original Delmonicos closed in the 20s or 30s (having long ago moved to various locations uptown, BTW). Then, in the fifties, someone opened a new Delmonico's downtown, trading on the original Delmonico's name. But it's not a continuation of the same business.
This review kind of surprised me...I mean, I'm aware that its not exactly a trendy menu, but when I'm in the mood for steak Delmonico's is always on my short list. It seems odd that this review focuses on everything else, with only a throw away line for what should be the centerpiece, it's eponymous steak and other cuts of steak. As far as I'm concerned it can stand toe to toe with any steakhouse in the city, and is without a doubt my favorite downtown- the dark, gilded age decor is just a bonus.